Major New Issues with Vaccines Are Surfacing

“The charade about polio eradication and the great savings it will bring has persisted to date. It is a paradox that while the director general of WHO, Margret Chan, and Bill Gates are trying to muster support for polio eradication (22) it has been known to the scientific community, for over 10 years, that eradication of polio is impossible. This is because in 2002 scientists had synthesised a chemical called poliovirus in a test-tube with the empirical formula C332,652H492,388N98,245O131,196P7, 501S2,340. It has been demonstrated that by positioning the atoms in sequence, a particle can emerge with all the properties required for its proliferation and survival in nature (23, 24).” [Emphasis added.]

“Wimmer writes that the test-tube synthesis of poliovirus has wiped out any possibility of eradicating poliovirus in the future. Poliovirus cannot be declared extinct because the sequence of its genome is known and modern biotechnology allows it to be resurrected at any time in vitro. Man can thus never let down his guard against poliovirus. Indeed the 18-year-old global eradication campaign for polioviruses will have to be continued in some format forever. The long promised ‘infinite’ monetary benefits from ceasing to vaccinate against poliovirus will never be achieved (24). The attraction that ‘eradication’ has for policy makers will vanish once this truth is widely known.”

The second is that the synthetic polio virus created in biotech labs is more virulent, and more likely to kill than the natural one.

The biotech industry has created other new synthetic viruses. Pertussis is another. There, too, the world is seeing increasing cases of pertussis among the vaccinated, and in fact, the diseases is spreading among them. Of particular note is the relation to a new strain of bacteria. Is this also a biotech synthetic virus?

“Dr. Fritz Mooi, a well-known Dutch scientist who has been studying mutations of the pertussis bacteria for 15 years, said a more virulent strain of bacteria is contributing to outbreaks.”

Meanwhile, measles vaccines are showing the same propensity to cause the disease they are supposed to prevent. In Largest measles outbreak in the Americas since 2000: Quebec Ongoing Epidemic, Philippe Belanger, Ministèr of Social Services in Québec, Montréal, stated:

“While this still ongoing outbreak feeds largely on unvaccinated individuals, the high proportion of cases who received two doses raises concerns on vaccine effectiveness. However, the take-home message is still to get vaccinated.”

Gaia Health takes exception with that last sentence: “Belanger overstates the facts. In some areas, as demonstrated by De Serres’ study, more of the vaccinated have come down with measles.”

Dr. Gaston De Serres, an infectious diseases expert with the Quebec’s public health agency, is the lead author of another study, which shows that 52 of 98 measles cases in teens who’d been fully vaccinated, reports Gaia Health.

“Exactly why getting vaccinated is the ‘take-home message’ doesn’t appear to be explained,” says Gaia Health. “As is so often the case in vaccination issues, the need for vaccines is taken on faith.”

Based on an unpublished WHO study on measles risk among the vaccinated and unvaccinated, Mr. Belanger should not be surprised that those who have been vaccinated for measles would be contracting measles. In fact, it should be expected.

Studies over many years have shown vaccines causing the very diseases they claim to prevent, and even causing more diseases. But the new issues with vaccines extend beyond even these disturbing facts:

• Vaccines for measles, pertussis and polio, are, at a minimum, not preventing the diseases they are supposed to have ensured against;

• In some cases, such as polio, the vaccines are causing diseases that they were supposed to prevent and a more virulent strain;

• At least with polio, the disease is now ineradicable because the biotech industry has created a synthetic strain (and this may apply to many other disease viruses the biotech/vaccine industry is working on); and

• The new synthetic strain used in the polio vaccine is more virulent, making vaccination more dangerous than contracting the natural disease. Is this true of the other vaccines?

Obviously, it is quite serious that vaccines are causing diseases and in the case of polio, introducing more deadly strains. But these are not the limit of the serious new concerns with the vaccines. Two other issues now claim attention:

1. The use of polysorbated 80 – a sterilizing agent - in all the mandated vaccines for children in the US and in the increasingly mandated flu vaccine. It is without doubt a sterilizing agent since it is effective enough in that capacity to be listed as the preferred ingredient in a pharmaceutical industry patent entitled “A Fertility Impairing Vaccine.” (US children are being exposed to it 60 or more times, starting on the day of birth.) Organic Health Adviser writes:

“On the World Intellectual Property Organization, a patent application for a ‘fertility impairing vaccine.’ The University of Georgia Research Foundation is listed as the patent applicant. In the description section of the patent application, Tween 80 (Polysorbate 80) is listed as a preferred ingredient:

“’In a preferred embodiment the vaccine comprises oil, preferably a biodegradable oil such as squalene oil, in an amount of about 2.5% to about 15%, preferably about 8% to about 12%. In preparing the vaccine it is advantageous to combine a concentrated oily adjuvant composition with an aqueous solution of the antigen, pZP glycoprotein. Typically, the vaccine is prepared using an adjuvant concentrate which contains lecithin (about 5% to about 15 % wt/vol, preferably about 12% wt/vol) and STDCM (preferably about 25 mg/mL to about 50 mg/mL) in squalene oil. The term % wt/vol means grams per 100 mL of liquid. The aqueous solution containing the isolated pZP glycoprotein is typically a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution, and additionally preferably contains Tween 80 (about 0.2% vol/vol to about 0.8% vol/vol, preferably about 0.4% vol/vol).’”

From William Engdahl, referring to Bill Gates:

“…. the central theme and purpose of the secret Good Club meeting of the plutocrats was the priority concern posed by Bill Gates, namely, how to advance more effectively their agenda of birth control and global population reduction.”

Vaccine experiments in the concentration camps were designed to do that.

“[The public is aware of] Mengele’s experiments on twins, perhaps of other hideous experiments done to Auschwitz prisoners, but seem unaware of or to have forgotten one specific type of medical experiment – the sterilization experiments done with untested, unknown vaccines, on Jewish women who could not say no.

“Auschwitz was the largest and one of the most infamous of the camps and the site of numerous ‘medical’ experiments. This historical study uses primary source documents obtained from archives in England and Germany to describe one type of experiment carried out at Auschwitz — the sterilization experiments…”

2. The introduction of patented intellectual property into all American children and many adults, which raises unaddressed legal questions over who has claim to their bodies, blood, organs, etc. All the new vaccines use patented genetically engineered synthetic material (GMOs) which are shot into people’s DNA in the same manner as the biotech industry shoots GMOs into the DNA of seeds. The biotech industry is aggressive in claiming rights to what they assert as their intellectual property, even against farmers’ land was contaminated against their will through pollination by GMO plants. Without people realizing it, their human DNA is being contaminated by patented GMOs in vaccines, GMOS that come with intellectual property protection. All issues of whose property people’s DNA becomes have not been mentioned anywhere and thus never discussed.

From Nurses and the sterilization experiments of Auschwitz: a postmodernist perspective, speaking of a new ethics, post Aschwitz:

“At the heart of this new ethics is the testimony of suffering that reflects the Nazi attempt to reduce the human to a mere biological substance, a degree of degradation that erases meaningful distinctions between human and non-human, life and death, ethics and physiology.”

The modern pharmaceutical industry seeks that blurring of distinctions:

“These corporations are voraciously patenting the earth’s life forms-its plants, bacteria, viruses, animals and even human genetic lineages. Reproduction of plants, animals and humans may eventually be totally controlled by these corporations, genetically-altered, recombined into chimeric life forms and exploited for profit.”

3. The pandemic laws put in place by Bush (whose family is closely tied to the pharmaceutical/biotech industry and made their fortune in Germany) lack public health measures but would establish medical martial law and the forcing of untested (even unknown) vaccines onto the entire population, without the government needing proof an emergency or even that a disease be present.

The wealthiest people in the world, including Gates, are interested in drastically reducing the population. The Bush laws around pandemics are vague enough to invoke at any time and give unlimited power over everyone’s bodies, stirring up parallels to the Nazis forcing unknown and untested vaccines on people, writes Dr. Rath:

“The pharmaceutical departments of the IG Farben cartel used the victims of the concentration camps in their own way: thousands of them died during human experiments such as the testing of new and unknown vaccines.”

The pharmaceutical industry used the false idea that vaccines are miracles that save people, and the ongoing and stunning falsehood that a flu pandemic killed millions in 1918, to put in place grossly unconstitutional laws that could be invoked at will. Those laws would use our own military as an unwitting instrument of harm and potentially of death for Americans.

In 2005, researchers Susan Benedict and Jane M. Georges noted:

“Foucault (1979, 140) utilized the term ‘bio-power’ to express the exercise of technology to achieve subjugation…. Agamben asserts that the ethics that remains ‘after Auschwitz’ is an ethics of testimony, and the fundamental task of such an ethics is to bear witness.”

But Bill Gates, whose vaccines are verifiably paralyzing thousands of children in India and killing twice the number that would have died if they had been paralyzed by a natural disease, attempted in his interview with Sanjay Gupta on CNN, to stop anyone from bearing witness. He accused anyone who was doubtful of vaccines of killing children — that group included parents whose children have been injured by vaccines or died from them.

Such words from Gates are a means to block “testimony,” to stop people from bearing the most painful of witness.